data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09ab6/09ab649c266b56cafdcb7d402c15c0ccfaca1742" alt=""
An interesting article by Libby Brooks, on the Graun's website, almost makes me think I'm reading more Stieg. There was a lot in those books about the Swedish legal system.
"In fact what is significant about the Swedish system is not that it employs a broader definition of rape than in other countries – it doesn't – but that prosecutions are based not on consent but whether a complainant's "sexual integrity" has been violated. In addition, alleged victims can instruct their own lawyers, who often seek second opinions after an initial dismissal, which may offer a rather more pedestrian explanation for why the cases have been re-opened now."
Even a Swedish fringe freedom-of-speech organisation, doesn't believe the hype.
"Groups supporting Wikileaks in Stockholm also rejected speculation that the case was politically motivated.
Rick Falkvinge, leader of Sweden's Pirate party, a fringe pro-freedom of speech and anti-copyright party, said: "In theory, if you wanted to strike back at WikiLeaks to discredit the organisation, this would be blueprint 1A, but I have not seen anything to indicate that this was politically motivated." "
So, to counterbalance the misogyny with some woman worship, I give you, once again, Dame Helen. Isn't she just the best?
2 comments:
Did you know that Helen's family were friends of Steve's parents and that I met her once:)
I did, and I am envious!
Post a Comment